# jitsu vs sdnext

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | jitsu | sdnext |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 71/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Customer Data Platform | #3 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 5 121 | 7 362 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +31 ✓ | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | jitsu-cli1.11.0 · 9 Jul 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

sdnext scores 71/100 against 63/100 for jitsu, so it is the safer default.

jitsu ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sdnext.

If you want the quickest setup, sdnext is easier to run; jitsu needs more configuration.

## Details

- [jitsu](https://selfhost.directory/project/jitsu) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jitsu.md)
- [sdnext](https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/jitsu-vs-sdnext