jitsuvssdnext
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| jitsu | sdnext | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Customer Data Platform | #3 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 5 121 | 7 362 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +33 | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 0 |
| Latest release | jitsu-cli1.11.0 · 9 Jul 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
sdnext scores 71/100 against 62/100 for jitsu, so it is the safer default.
jitsu ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sdnext.
If you want the quickest setup, sdnext is easier to run; jitsu needs more configuration.
jitsu is growing faster right now (+33 stars in 30 days).
jitsu details →sdnext details →
Swap a project
Keep jitsu, compare it with
Keep sdnext, compare it with