# Jitsi Videobridge vs MiroTalk C2C

> Two self-hosted [Zoom alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/zoom), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Jitsi Videobridge | MiroTalk C2C |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 ✓ | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 25 in Video Conferencing | #14 of 25 in Video Conferencing |
| GitHub stars | 3 107 ✓ | 520 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 | +8 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | stable/jitsi-meet_11248 · 14 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Kotlin | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Jitsi Videobridge scores 65/100 against 56/100 for MiroTalk C2C, so it is the safer default.

Jitsi Videobridge ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for MiroTalk C2C.

If you want the quickest setup, MiroTalk C2C is easier to run; Jitsi Videobridge needs more configuration.

MiroTalk C2C is growing faster right now (+8 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Jitsi Videobridge](https://selfhost.directory/project/jitsi-videobridge) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jitsi-videobridge.md)
- [MiroTalk C2C](https://selfhost.directory/project/mirotalk-c2c) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mirotalk-c2c.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/jitsi-videobridge-vs-mirotalk-c2c