# Jitsi Video Bridge vs Pulumi

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Jitsi Video Bridge | Pulumi |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 25 in Video Conferencing | #1 of 3 in Infrastructure |
| GitHub stars | 3 107 | 25 829 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 | +30 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | stable/jitsi-meet_11248 · 14 Sept 2026 | v3.272.0 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Kotlin | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Pulumi scores 78/100 against 66/100 for Jitsi Video Bridge, so it is the safer default.

Jitsi Video Bridge ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Pulumi.

If you want the quickest setup, Pulumi is easier to run; Jitsi Video Bridge needs more configuration.

Pulumi is growing faster right now (+30 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Jitsi Video Bridge](https://selfhost.directory/project/jitsi-video-bridge) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jitsi-video-bridge.md)
- [Pulumi](https://selfhost.directory/project/pulumi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pulumi.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/jitsi-video-bridge-vs-pulumi