Jitsi Video BridgevsPulumi
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Jitsi Video Bridge | Pulumi | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 25 in Video Conferencing | #1 of 3 in Infrastructure |
| GitHub stars | 3 107 | 25 825 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 | +26 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 5 |
| Latest release | stable/jitsi-meet_11248 · 14 Sept 2026 | v3.272.0 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Kotlin | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Pulumi scores 78/100 against 66/100 for Jitsi Video Bridge, so it is the safer default.
Jitsi Video Bridge ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Pulumi.
If you want the quickest setup, Pulumi is easier to run; Jitsi Video Bridge needs more configuration.
Pulumi is growing faster right now (+26 stars in 30 days).
Jitsi Video Bridge details →Pulumi details →
Swap a project
Keep Jitsi Video Bridge, compare it with
Keep Pulumi, compare it with