# jevos vs OmniVoice-Studio

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | jevos | OmniVoice-Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 94/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 7 in Local AI | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 929 | 92 870 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +57 929 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 35 ✓ |
| Latest release | jevos-v5 · 17 Oct 2026 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 50/100 for jevos, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for jevos.

If you want the quickest setup, jevos is easier to run; OmniVoice-Studio needs more configuration.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 929 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [jevos](https://selfhost.directory/project/jev) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jev.md)
- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/jev-vs-omnivoice-studio