# jenkins vs uncompressed

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | jenkins | uncompressed |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 28 in CI/CD | #71 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 26 702 ✓ | 213 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +116 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 32 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | jenkins-2.580.2 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.0.0 · 4 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

jenkins scores 82/100 against 47/100 for uncompressed, so it is the safer default.

jenkins ships more often: 32 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for uncompressed.

If you want the quickest setup, jenkins is easier to run; uncompressed needs more configuration.

jenkins is growing faster right now (+116 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [jenkins](https://selfhost.directory/project/jenkins) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jenkins.md)
- [uncompressed](https://selfhost.directory/project/uncompressed) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uncompressed.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/jenkins-vs-uncompressed