# jenkins vs MikroDash

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | jenkins | MikroDash |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 28 in CI/CD | #27 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 26 705 ✓ | 633 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +119 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 32 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | jenkins-2.580.2 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.8.77 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

jenkins scores 82/100 against 49/100 for MikroDash, so it is the safer default.

jenkins ships more often: 32 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for MikroDash.

If you want the quickest setup, MikroDash is easier to run; jenkins needs more configuration.

jenkins is growing faster right now (+119 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [jenkins](https://selfhost.directory/project/jenkins) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jenkins.md)
- [MikroDash](https://selfhost.directory/project/mikrodash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mikrodash.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/jenkins-vs-mikrodash