# jellysweep vs Stash

> Two self-hosted [Media Management projects](https://selfhost.directory/media-management), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | jellysweep | Stash |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #97 of 142 in Media Management | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 260 | 13 309 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +299 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 7 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.16.1 · 15 Sept 2026 ✓ | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Stash scores 78/100 against 45/100 for jellysweep, so it is the safer default.

Stash ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for jellysweep.

If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; jellysweep needs more configuration.

Stash is growing faster right now (+299 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [jellysweep](https://selfhost.directory/project/jellysweep) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jellysweep.md)
- [Stash](https://selfhost.directory/project/stash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stash.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/jellysweep-vs-stash