jellysweepvsStash
Two self-hosted Media Management projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| jellysweep | Stash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #97 of 142 in Media Management | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 260 | 13 308 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +298 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 7 |
| Latest release | v0.16.1 · 15 Sept 2026 | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Stash scores 78/100 against 45/100 for jellysweep, so it is the safer default.
Stash ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for jellysweep.
If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; jellysweep needs more configuration.
Stash is growing faster right now (+298 stars in 30 days).
jellysweep details →Stash details →All Media Management projects →