# jellysweep vs MeTube

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | jellysweep | MeTube |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #98 of 142 in Media Management | #4 of 45 in Download Management |
| GitHub stars | 260 | 15 126 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +289 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 48 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.16.1 · 15 Sept 2026 | 2026.10.27 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

MeTube scores 76/100 against 45/100 for jellysweep, so it is the safer default.

MeTube ships more often: 48 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for jellysweep.

If you want the quickest setup, MeTube is easier to run; jellysweep needs more configuration.

MeTube is growing faster right now (+289 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [jellysweep](https://selfhost.directory/project/jellysweep) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jellysweep.md)
- [MeTube](https://selfhost.directory/project/metube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/metube.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/jellysweep-vs-metube