# jellysweep vs MediaMTX

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | jellysweep | MediaMTX |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 79/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #97 of 142 in Media Management | #3 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 260 | 20 540 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +288 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 18 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.16.1 · 15 Sept 2026 | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 45/100 for jellysweep, so it is the safer default.

MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for jellysweep.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; jellysweep needs more configuration.

MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+288 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [jellysweep](https://selfhost.directory/project/jellysweep) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jellysweep.md)
- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/jellysweep-vs-mediamtx