jellysweepvsLibation
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| jellysweep | Libation | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #97 of 142 in Media Management | #2 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 260 | 6 375 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +154 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 33 |
| Latest release | v0.16.1 · 15 Sept 2026 | v14.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | C |
Which one should you pick?
Libation scores 68/100 against 45/100 for jellysweep, so it is the safer default.
Libation ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for jellysweep.
If you want the quickest setup, Libation is easier to run; jellysweep needs more configuration.
Libation is growing faster right now (+154 stars in 30 days).
jellysweep details →Libation details →