JellySearchvsmedia-stack
Two self-hosted Media Server projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| JellySearch | media-stack | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 58/100 |
| Rank in category | #65 of 119 in Media Server | #34 of 119 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | — | 1 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +13 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | mit | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | — | — |
Which one should you pick?
media-stack scores 58/100 against 50/100 for JellySearch, so it is the safer default.
media-stack is growing faster right now (+13 stars in 30 days).
Key differences
- License: JellySearch is mit, media-stack is GPL-3.0.
- Features only JellySearch lists: Client-transparent via reverse proxy, Full-text search proxy, Genre search, Multi-field search and 3 more.
- Features only media-stack lists: AI-powered recommendations, Compose-profile deployment, Media request management, Media streaming and 5 more.
JellySearch details →media-stack details →All Media Server projects →
Swap a project
Keep JellySearch, compare it with
Keep media-stack, compare it with