# Jellyfin vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Jellyfin | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 118 in Media Server | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 58 737 ✓ | 8 651 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 294 ✓ | +156 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v12.4 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Jellyfin scores 88/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.

Jellyfin ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; Jellyfin needs more configuration.

Jellyfin is growing faster right now (+1 294 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Jellyfin](https://selfhost.directory/project/jellyfin) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jellyfin.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/jellyfin-vs-workout-cool