# Jellyfin vs SonarQube

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Jellyfin | SonarQube |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 ✓ | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 118 in Media Server | #2 of 10 in Code Review |
| GitHub stars | 58 774 ✓ | 11 125 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 300 ✓ | +103 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 12 |
| Latest release | v12.4 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Jellyfin scores 88/100 against 71/100 for SonarQube, so it is the safer default.

Jellyfin ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for SonarQube.

If you want the quickest setup, Jellyfin is easier to run; SonarQube needs more configuration.

Jellyfin is growing faster right now (+1 300 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Jellyfin](https://selfhost.directory/project/jellyfin) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jellyfin.md)
- [SonarQube](https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarqube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarqube.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/jellyfin-vs-sonarqube