# Jellyfin vs snibox

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Jellyfin | snibox |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 ✓ | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 118 in Media Server | #3 of 6 in Code Management |
| GitHub stars | 58 774 ✓ | 1 812 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 300 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v12.4 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

Jellyfin scores 88/100 against 54/100 for snibox, so it is the safer default.

Jellyfin ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for snibox.

Jellyfin is growing faster right now (+1 300 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Jellyfin](https://selfhost.directory/project/jellyfin) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jellyfin.md)
- [snibox](https://selfhost.directory/project/snibox) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/snibox.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/jellyfin-vs-snibox