# Jellyfin vs LubeLogger

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Jellyfin | LubeLogger |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 ✓ | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 118 in Media Server | #2 of 5 in Vehicle Management |
| GitHub stars | 58 772 ✓ | 2 926 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 298 ✓ | +69 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | v12.4 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.7.4 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Jellyfin scores 88/100 against 65/100 for LubeLogger, so it is the safer default.

LubeLogger ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for Jellyfin.

If you want the quickest setup, LubeLogger is easier to run; Jellyfin needs more configuration.

Jellyfin is growing faster right now (+1 298 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Jellyfin](https://selfhost.directory/project/jellyfin) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jellyfin.md)
- [LubeLogger](https://selfhost.directory/project/lubelogger) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lubelogger.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/jellyfin-vs-lubelogger