# Jellyfin-Auto-Collections vs OmniVoice-Studio

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Jellyfin-Auto-Collections | OmniVoice-Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 94/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #78 of 118 in Media Server | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 286 | 92 975 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +58 034 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 35 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 46/100 for Jellyfin-Auto-Collections, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Jellyfin-Auto-Collections.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 034 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Jellyfin-Auto-Collections](https://selfhost.directory/project/jellyfin-auto-collections) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jellyfin-auto-collections.md)
- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/jellyfin-auto-collections-vs-omnivoice-studio