# J.A.R.V.I.S vs openclaw

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | J.A.R.V.I.S | openclaw |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 38/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 11 in Voice Assistants | #1 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 201 | 393 312 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 888 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 37 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

openclaw scores 93/100 against 38/100 for J.A.R.V.I.S, so it is the safer default.

openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for J.A.R.V.I.S.

If you want the quickest setup, openclaw is easier to run; J.A.R.V.I.S needs more configuration.

openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 888 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [J.A.R.V.I.S](https://selfhost.directory/project/jarvis-ai) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jarvis-ai.md)
- [openclaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/jarvis-ai-vs-openclaw