# J.A.R.V.I.S vs llama.cpp

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | J.A.R.V.I.S | llama.cpp |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 38/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 11 in Voice Assistants | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 201 | 132 689 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +3 234 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1464 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | b11978 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 38/100 for J.A.R.V.I.S, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1464 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for J.A.R.V.I.S.

If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; J.A.R.V.I.S needs more configuration.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 234 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [J.A.R.V.I.S](https://selfhost.directory/project/jarvis-ai) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jarvis-ai.md)
- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/jarvis-ai-vs-llamacpp