# Janus WebRTC Server vs Stirling-PDF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Janus WebRTC Server | Stirling-PDF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #9 of 118 in Media Server | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 9 197 | 95 319 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +27 | +2 357 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 25 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | C | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 70/100 for Janus WebRTC Server, so it is the safer default.

Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Janus WebRTC Server.

If you want the quickest setup, Stirling-PDF is easier to run; Janus WebRTC Server needs more configuration.

Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 357 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Janus WebRTC Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/janus-webrtc-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/janus-webrtc-server.md)
- [Stirling-PDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/janus-webrtc-server-vs-stirling-pdf