Janus WebRTC ServervsSRS
Two self-hosted Media Server projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Janus WebRTC Server | SRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 118 in Media Server | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 9 197 | 29 390 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +28 | +113 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 13 |
| Latest release | — | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C | C |
Which one should you pick?
SRS scores 78/100 against 71/100 for Janus WebRTC Server, so it is the safer default.
SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Janus WebRTC Server.
If you want the quickest setup, SRS is easier to run; Janus WebRTC Server needs more configuration.
SRS is growing faster right now (+113 stars in 30 days).
Janus WebRTC Server details →SRS details →All Media Server projects →
Swap a project
Keep Janus WebRTC Server, compare it with
Keep SRS, compare it with