Janus WebRTC ServervsResume-Matcher
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Janus WebRTC Server | Resume-Matcher | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 118 in Media Server | #1 of 12 in Document Processing |
| GitHub stars | 9 197 | 28 923 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +27 | +409 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 |
| Latest release | — | v1.4.0 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Resume-Matcher scores 81/100 against 70/100 for Janus WebRTC Server, so it is the safer default.
Resume-Matcher ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Janus WebRTC Server.
If you want the quickest setup, Resume-Matcher is easier to run; Janus WebRTC Server needs more configuration.
Resume-Matcher is growing faster right now (+409 stars in 30 days).
Janus WebRTC Server details →Resume-Matcher details →
Swap a project
Keep Janus WebRTC Server, compare it with
Keep Resume-Matcher, compare it with