# Janus WebRTC Server vs Reactive Resume

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Janus WebRTC Server | Reactive Resume |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #9 of 118 in Media Server | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 9 197 | 45 067 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +27 | +1 666 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 35 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 70/100 for Janus WebRTC Server, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Janus WebRTC Server.

If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; Janus WebRTC Server needs more configuration.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 666 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Janus WebRTC Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/janus-webrtc-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/janus-webrtc-server.md)
- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/janus-webrtc-server-vs-reactive-resume