Janus WebRTC ServervsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Janus WebRTC Server | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 118 in Media Server | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 9 197 | 45 067 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +27 | +1 666 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 35 |
| Latest release | — | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 70/100 for Janus WebRTC Server, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Janus WebRTC Server.
If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; Janus WebRTC Server needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 666 stars in 30 days).
Janus WebRTC Server details →Reactive Resume details →
Swap a project
Keep Janus WebRTC Server, compare it with
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with