# Janus WebRTC Server vs PaddleOCR

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Janus WebRTC Server | PaddleOCR |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #9 of 118 in Media Server | #1 of 4 in OCR |
| GitHub stars | 9 197 | 91 926 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +27 | +485 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 70/100 for Janus WebRTC Server, so it is the safer default.

PaddleOCR ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Janus WebRTC Server.

If you want the quickest setup, PaddleOCR is easier to run; Janus WebRTC Server needs more configuration.

PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+485 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Janus WebRTC Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/janus-webrtc-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/janus-webrtc-server.md)
- [PaddleOCR](https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/janus-webrtc-server-vs-paddleocr