Janus WebRTC ServervsMisskey
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Janus WebRTC Server | Misskey | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 118 in Media Server | #1 of 5 in Fediverse |
| GitHub stars | 9 197 | 11 366 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +27 | +42 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 9 |
| Latest release | — | 2026.10.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Misskey scores 74/100 against 70/100 for Janus WebRTC Server, so it is the safer default.
Misskey ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Janus WebRTC Server.
If you want the quickest setup, Misskey is easier to run; Janus WebRTC Server needs more configuration.
Janus WebRTC Server details →Misskey details →
Swap a project
Keep Janus WebRTC Server, compare it with
Keep Misskey, compare it with