Janus WebRTC Servervskoodo-reader
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Janus WebRTC Server | koodo-reader | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 118 in Media Server | #1 of 7 in E-book Management |
| GitHub stars | 9 197 | 28 663 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +27 | +371 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 19 |
| Latest release | — | v2.4.6 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
koodo-reader scores 78/100 against 70/100 for Janus WebRTC Server, so it is the safer default.
koodo-reader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Janus WebRTC Server.
If you want the quickest setup, koodo-reader is easier to run; Janus WebRTC Server needs more configuration.
koodo-reader is growing faster right now (+371 stars in 30 days).
Janus WebRTC Server details →koodo-reader details →
Swap a project
Keep Janus WebRTC Server, compare it with
Keep koodo-reader, compare it with