JackettvsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Jackett | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 2 in Indexer | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 16 281 | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +212 | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 144 | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.24.2961 · 29 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Jackett scores 73/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.
Jackett ships more often: 144 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
If you want the quickest setup, Jackett is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
Jackett is growing faster right now (+212 stars in 30 days).
Jackett details →Tube Archivist details →