JackettvsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Jackett | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 2 in Indexer | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 16 281 | 45 045 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +212 | +1 644 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 144 | 35 |
| Latest release | v0.24.2961 · 29 Oct 2026 | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 73/100 for Jackett, so it is the safer default.
Jackett ships more often: 144 stable releases in the past year, against 35 for Reactive Resume.
If you want the quickest setup, Jackett is easier to run; Reactive Resume needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 644 stars in 30 days).
Jackett details →Reactive Resume details →