JackettvsOmniVoice-Studio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Jackett | OmniVoice-Studio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 94/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 2 in Indexer | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 16 280 | 92 975 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +213 | +58 034 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 143 | 35 |
| Latest release | v0.24.2949 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 73/100 for Jackett, so it is the safer default.
Jackett ships more often: 143 stable releases in the past year, against 35 for OmniVoice-Studio.
If you want the quickest setup, Jackett is easier to run; OmniVoice-Studio needs more configuration.
OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 034 stars in 30 days).
Jackett details →OmniVoice-Studio details →