# issue-status vs SearXNG

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | issue-status | SearXNG |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #31 of 51 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 429 | 38 961 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 395 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

SearXNG scores 86/100 against 47/100 for issue-status, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, issue-status is easier to run; SearXNG needs more configuration.

SearXNG is growing faster right now (+1 395 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [issue-status](https://selfhost.directory/project/issue-status) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/issue-status.md)
- [SearXNG](https://selfhost.directory/project/searxng) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/searxng.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/issue-status-vs-searxng