# IPFS Web UI vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | IPFS Web UI | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 61/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #12 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 1 636 | 2 260 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v4.13.0 · 18 Sept 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 60/100 for IPFS Web UI, so it is the safer default.

Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for IPFS Web UI.

If you want the quickest setup, IPFS Web UI is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

## Details

- [IPFS Web UI](https://selfhost.directory/project/ipfs-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ipfs-webui.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ipfs-webui-vs-windows-arm