# IPFS Web UI vs Urbit

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | IPFS Web UI | Urbit |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 63/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #12 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 1 636 | 3 622 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 6 |
| Latest release | v4.13.0 · 18 Sept 2026 ✓ | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | hoon |

## Which one should you pick?

Urbit scores 63/100 against 60/100 for IPFS Web UI, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, IPFS Web UI is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.

Urbit is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [IPFS Web UI](https://selfhost.directory/project/ipfs-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ipfs-webui.md)
- [Urbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ipfs-webui-vs-urbit