# IPFS Web UI vs Upptime

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | IPFS Web UI | Upptime |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #13 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 1 636 | 17 185 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v4.13.0 · 18 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Markdown |

## Which one should you pick?

Upptime scores 69/100 against 60/100 for IPFS Web UI, so it is the safer default.

IPFS Web UI ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.

Upptime is growing faster right now (+1 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [IPFS Web UI](https://selfhost.directory/project/ipfs-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ipfs-webui.md)
- [Upptime](https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ipfs-webui-vs-upptime