# IPFS Web UI vs Twenty

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | IPFS Web UI | Twenty |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 84/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #13 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration | #1 of 21 in CRM |
| GitHub stars | 1 636 | 60 030 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 572 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v4.13.0 · 18 Sept 2026 | twenty/v2.52.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Twenty scores 84/100 against 60/100 for IPFS Web UI, so it is the safer default.

Twenty ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for IPFS Web UI.

If you want the quickest setup, IPFS Web UI is easier to run; Twenty needs more configuration.

Twenty is growing faster right now (+2 572 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [IPFS Web UI](https://selfhost.directory/project/ipfs-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ipfs-webui.md)
- [Twenty](https://selfhost.directory/project/twenty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/twenty.md)

## Related comparisons

- [ERPNext vs Twenty](https://selfhost.directory/compare/erpnext-vs-twenty)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ipfs-webui-vs-twenty