# IPFS Web UI vs supabase

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | IPFS Web UI | supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 92/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #13 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 636 | 114 288 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +3 540 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | v4.13.0 · 18 Sept 2026 ✓ | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

supabase scores 92/100 against 60/100 for IPFS Web UI, so it is the safer default.

supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for IPFS Web UI.

If you want the quickest setup, IPFS Web UI is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.

supabase is growing faster right now (+3 540 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [IPFS Web UI](https://selfhost.directory/project/ipfs-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ipfs-webui.md)
- [supabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ipfs-webui-vs-supabase