# IPFS Web UI vs Pi-hole

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | IPFS Web UI | Pi-hole |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #12 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 1 636 | 61 541 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +497 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 6 |
| Latest release | v4.13.0 · 18 Sept 2026 | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 60/100 for IPFS Web UI, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, IPFS Web UI is easier to run; Pi-hole needs more configuration.

Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+497 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [IPFS Web UI](https://selfhost.directory/project/ipfs-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ipfs-webui.md)
- [Pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ipfs-webui-vs-pi-hole