# ADAMANT IPFS Node vs Technitium DNS Server

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ADAMANT IPFS Node | Technitium DNS Server |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 77/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 15 in File Storage | #3 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 307 | 10 248 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +260 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.1.0 · 30 Sept 2026 | v15.6.2 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Technitium DNS Server scores 77/100 against 48/100 for ADAMANT IPFS Node, so it is the safer default.

Technitium DNS Server ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for ADAMANT IPFS Node.

If you want the quickest setup, Technitium DNS Server is easier to run; ADAMANT IPFS Node needs more configuration.

Technitium DNS Server is growing faster right now (+260 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ADAMANT IPFS Node](https://selfhost.directory/project/ipfs-node) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ipfs-node.md)
- [Technitium DNS Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/technitium-dns-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/technitium-dns-server.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ipfs-node-vs-technitium-dns-server