# ADAMANT IPFS Node vs Tailscale

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ADAMANT IPFS Node | Tailscale |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 84/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 15 in File Storage | #1 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 307 | 38 252 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 447 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 14 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.1.0 · 30 Sept 2026 | v1.104.4 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Tailscale scores 84/100 against 48/100 for ADAMANT IPFS Node, so it is the safer default.

Tailscale ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for ADAMANT IPFS Node.

If you want the quickest setup, Tailscale is easier to run; ADAMANT IPFS Node needs more configuration.

Tailscale is growing faster right now (+1 447 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ADAMANT IPFS Node](https://selfhost.directory/project/ipfs-node) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ipfs-node.md)
- [Tailscale](https://selfhost.directory/project/tailscale) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tailscale.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ipfs-node-vs-tailscale