# ADAMANT IPFS Node vs supabase

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ADAMANT IPFS Node | supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 92/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 15 in File Storage | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 307 | 114 255 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +3 546 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.1.0 · 30 Sept 2026 ✓ | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

supabase scores 92/100 against 48/100 for ADAMANT IPFS Node, so it is the safer default.

supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for ADAMANT IPFS Node.

supabase is growing faster right now (+3 546 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ADAMANT IPFS Node](https://selfhost.directory/project/ipfs-node) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ipfs-node.md)
- [supabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ipfs-node-vs-supabase