# ADAMANT IPFS Node vs SeaweedFS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ADAMANT IPFS Node | SeaweedFS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 15 in File Storage | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 307 | 35 794 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +869 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 28 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.1.0 · 30 Sept 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 48/100 for ADAMANT IPFS Node, so it is the safer default.

SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for ADAMANT IPFS Node.

If you want the quickest setup, SeaweedFS is easier to run; ADAMANT IPFS Node needs more configuration.

SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+869 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ADAMANT IPFS Node](https://selfhost.directory/project/ipfs-node) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ipfs-node.md)
- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ipfs-node-vs-seaweedfs