# ADAMANT IPFS Node vs Redis

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ADAMANT IPFS Node | Redis |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 15 in File Storage | #1 of 38 in Databases |
| GitHub stars | 307 | 77 149 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +695 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 36 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.1.0 · 30 Sept 2026 | 8.10.3 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Redis scores 86/100 against 48/100 for ADAMANT IPFS Node, so it is the safer default.

Redis ships more often: 36 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for ADAMANT IPFS Node.

If you want the quickest setup, Redis is easier to run; ADAMANT IPFS Node needs more configuration.

Redis is growing faster right now (+695 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ADAMANT IPFS Node](https://selfhost.directory/project/ipfs-node) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ipfs-node.md)
- [Redis](https://selfhost.directory/project/redis) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/redis.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ipfs-node-vs-redis