# ADAMANT IPFS Node vs OpenWrt

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ADAMANT IPFS Node | OpenWrt |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 15 in File Storage | #1 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 307 | 28 967 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +464 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.1.0 · 30 Sept 2026 | v25.12.6 · 18 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | C |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenWrt scores 83/100 against 48/100 for ADAMANT IPFS Node, so it is the safer default.

OpenWrt ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for ADAMANT IPFS Node.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenWrt is easier to run; ADAMANT IPFS Node needs more configuration.

OpenWrt is growing faster right now (+464 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ADAMANT IPFS Node](https://selfhost.directory/project/ipfs-node) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ipfs-node.md)
- [OpenWrt](https://selfhost.directory/project/openwrt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openwrt.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ipfs-node-vs-openwrt