# ADAMANT IPFS Node vs juicefs

> Two self-hosted [File Storage projects](https://selfhost.directory/file-storage), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ADAMANT IPFS Node | juicefs |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 15 in File Storage | #1 of 15 in File Storage |
| GitHub stars | 307 | 14 585 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +123 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.1.0 · 30 Sept 2026 | v1.4.2 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

juicefs scores 73/100 against 48/100 for ADAMANT IPFS Node, so it is the safer default.

juicefs ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for ADAMANT IPFS Node.

If you want the quickest setup, juicefs is easier to run; ADAMANT IPFS Node needs more configuration.

juicefs is growing faster right now (+123 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ADAMANT IPFS Node](https://selfhost.directory/project/ipfs-node) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ipfs-node.md)
- [juicefs](https://selfhost.directory/project/juicefs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/juicefs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ipfs-node-vs-juicefs