# ADAMANT IPFS Node vs jenkins

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ADAMANT IPFS Node | jenkins |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 15 in File Storage | #1 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 307 | 26 705 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +124 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 32 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.1.0 · 30 Sept 2026 | jenkins-2.580.2 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

jenkins scores 82/100 against 48/100 for ADAMANT IPFS Node, so it is the safer default.

jenkins ships more often: 32 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for ADAMANT IPFS Node.

If you want the quickest setup, jenkins is easier to run; ADAMANT IPFS Node needs more configuration.

jenkins is growing faster right now (+124 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ADAMANT IPFS Node](https://selfhost.directory/project/ipfs-node) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ipfs-node.md)
- [jenkins](https://selfhost.directory/project/jenkins) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jenkins.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ipfs-node-vs-jenkins