# InvokeAI vs Turtl

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | InvokeAI | Turtl |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Image Generation | #47 of 81 in Notes & Editors |
| GitHub stars | 28 910 ✓ | 631 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +624 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v6.14.2 · 27 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

InvokeAI scores 82/100 against 47/100 for Turtl, so it is the safer default.

InvokeAI ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Turtl.

If you want the quickest setup, InvokeAI is easier to run; Turtl needs more configuration.

InvokeAI is growing faster right now (+624 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [InvokeAI](https://selfhost.directory/project/invokeai) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/invokeai.md)
- [Turtl](https://selfhost.directory/project/turtl) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/turtl.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/invokeai-vs-turtl