InvokeAIvsrushdb
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| InvokeAI | rushdb | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Image Generation | #5 of 5 in Vector Database |
| GitHub stars | 28 907 | 325 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +621 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 33 |
| Latest release | v6.14.2 · 27 Sept 2026 | v3.0.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
InvokeAI scores 82/100 against 48/100 for rushdb, so it is the safer default.
rushdb ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for InvokeAI.
If you want the quickest setup, InvokeAI is easier to run; rushdb needs more configuration.
InvokeAI is growing faster right now (+621 stars in 30 days).
InvokeAI details →rushdb details →
Swap a project
Keep InvokeAI, compare it with
Keep rushdb, compare it with