InvokeAIvsR2R
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| InvokeAI | R2R | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Image Generation | #6 of 7 in RAG |
| GitHub stars | 28 904 | 8 047 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +624 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 0 |
| Latest release | v6.14.2 · 27 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
InvokeAI scores 82/100 against 59/100 for R2R, so it is the safer default.
InvokeAI ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for R2R.
If you want the quickest setup, InvokeAI is easier to run; R2R needs more configuration.
InvokeAI is growing faster right now (+624 stars in 30 days).
InvokeAI details →R2R details →
Swap a project
Keep InvokeAI, compare it with
Keep R2R, compare it with